Three Streamers

For any readers who stream movies from Netflix, I am now going to mention which movies in a new list were streamed on Flix [thanks Reiko for the suggestion]; but remember if you are reading a list later in time, the streaming rights may have expired. This list of 17 only includes 3 streamers; 13 came from the library and one (the top rated) was watched on TV.

Here is what I have watched since I posted my last list. The ratings I give are on my own number system which is explained at the link on the sidebar. The movies streamed via Netflix were:

Which Way Home

My Dog: An Unconditional Love Story

Kumare

Mr. Selfridge – 2013 (3.3). Shown on PBS Masterpiece, written by Andrew Davies, centered on a beautiful set of the famous London department store, and acted by a typically fine English cast with a few Americans thrown in, this dramatic series about the American founder of the famous store is another winner. Season one is set in 1909, as Selfridge comes to London with bold plans to employ American entrepreneurial skills and braggadocio to make all London take notice of his new store modeled after his Chicago success. Self-made from a deprived childhood, but with the constant love of his mother who is still with him, Selfridge has a wife and four young children. He also has a mistress, a gambling instinct and deep seated but hidden insecurities. We follow the man and his wife and the mistress, a music hall star, and those whose circle they enter in London, but we also follow the personal stories of some of the store managerial and working staff. The sumptuous store set is said to have been built for five years of use. Season two will jump ahead five years to the start of WWI, and further five year jumps would take us to 1919, the end of the war and aftermath of the flu epidemic, 1924, the roaring twenties, and 1929, the crash. These should be well worth the wait.

Hot Coffee – 2011 (3.2). Everyone knows about the woman who got rich suing McDonald’s because she spilled hot coffee on herself. This documentary grabs attention from the start by showing the true story of what actually happened to the woman, which is totally different from the impression we all were given by the media. The movie then goes on to show how making sure we were misinformed about the case is part of a wide ranging program led by the Chamber of Commerce on behalf of the largest corporations to limit the rights of individuals injured by wrongful actions of the corporations. In addition to using the media to stigmatize legitimate claimants, the corporate operation includes lobbying for laws to put limits on corporate liability, bankrolling the electoral campaigns of judges who favor the corporate agenda and inserting mandatory arbitration clauses in every contract they can in order to keep individuals from seeking redress by a civil jury and instead having to submit their case to an arbitrator inclined in favor of corporations. Individuals who have not been able to get fair redress for injuries suffered are shown telling their stories and consumer advocates and experts also contribute helpful interviews. This well-made film will be an eye opener for most viewers, especially when they realize that if the corporate takeover of our legal system is not stopped, they could be the next victim.

Which Way Home – 2009 (3.0). This Oscar nominated documentary follows several children from Central America as they ride on freight trains attempting to travel thousands of miles to the US border in hopes of crossing over. We are more familiar with the dangers of the actual border crossing, including double crossing coyotes, human predators and the oppressive heat of the desert, but this movie shows us the equally dangerous journey to try to get to the border. The children range in age from 9 to 17 and travel without adults. Many are trying with parental consent to get to a parent or other family member in the US, some are running away from home because of poverty or stepfamily conflict and a few are orphans who have been living on the streets and want to try for a new life up north. The film mostly shows the children talking about how and why they are traveling, with some interviews and footage of the homes and families they have left and some scenes of volunteers who try to keep the kids safe on their journey and some shots of the involvement with various immigration authorities. Sparse on screen writing gives supplemental information about the children, but there is no political, religious or sociological commentary. The children speak for themselves and they are quite sympathetic.

The Intouchables – 2012 (2.9).  A quadriplegic Parisian nobleman hires a black ex-con from the projects as his caregiver in this Oscar nominated French drama based on a true life story. Their opening hijinks are a bit of a turn off, but as the movie goes back to the beginning of the story, we find the caregiver is more endearing than expected, even though he retains his rough edges, and the patient has insecurities masked by his witty sense of humor. There are no cheap laughs or slapstick here, nor is there any overdone melodrama, just genuine joie de vivre mixed with the hard realities of life. Though the film is about the relationship between the men, it could have told us more about who they are outside the relationship, in order for us to more fully appreciate them.

Kumare – 2011 (2.9). Raised in America in a Hindu family, this young film maker wanted to know why so many people turn to a guru to find answers to their spiritual questions, so he went to India to check out some gurus there and then he came back to America and decided to pose as a guru to see if people would become his disciples. This documentary shows the man letting his hair and beard grow and inventing his own chants and yoga. He even adopted the voice of his Indian grandmother. This is not a satire or ridicule of people who look for answers about how to live their lives, though there are some people shown who are easy targets. It is instead one man’s attempt to validate and share his own sense that the real guru is the one inside us.

Loving Walter – 1983 (2.9). Stephen Frears directed Ian McKellan in two British TV dramas about a man with a mental developmental handicap making him incapable of living totally independent but who functioned well enough to hold a menial job and to relate well to other people. The first movie covered his teenage transition from living with his parents to being sent to an institution. The second took up 20 years later as he embarked on a time free of the institution living in a relationship with a woman. Using real settings and developmental patients, the movie has a semi-documentary feel. Realistically disturbing, the movies called attention to the need for reforms in rendering assistance and treatment to people with such conditions. The first film was called “Walter” and the second “Walter and June”. Combined on a 20th year anniversary DVD as “Loving Walter”, the disk also includes interviews with the writer, director and Sir Ian. [From memory, perhaps faulty, I had rated this movie as a did not like, but on this current viewing (2013), I have rated it much higher].

The Greatest Movie Ever Sold – 2011 (2.8). Morgan Spurlock of Super-Size Me fame is at it again in this fun documentary. He decides to make a movie solely with corporate funding in return for product placement in the film, and the movie in fact is about the effort to get the funding and make the movie to the satisfaction of the funders. The idea seems to be too oddball and Spurlock is continually rejected at first. But after getting advice from several people in the film and marketing business, he gets his first contributor and then carries on with growing confidence. A branding expert shown in the film says Spurlock is a balance of playful and mindful. This movie is definitely playful. It is mindful to the extent it makes us aware of the extent of product marketing through movies and raises the question of commercialism in art. Indeed it raises the bigger question of the proper role of advertising. But in spite of all the experts consulted, we never get much help in deciding whether product placement is good or bad.

My Dog: An Unconditional Love Story – 2010 (2.8). Short and simple, this documentary shows some famous New Yorkers interrelating with their dogs and talking about the benefits of dogs in general and their dogs in particular. If you like dogs, you will like the movie. If you are not a dog person but like loving relationships, you should like the movie and you might get tempted to get a dog, perhaps even to rescue one. If you have major problems with what happens to dogs when they get old and sick, then you probably should not get a dog and you may not want to watch this movie.

They Came To Play – 2008 (2.8). Amateur pianists over age 35 are invited to compete in an international competition hosted by the Van Cliburn Foundation in Texas, and this documentary follows many of them as they prepare themselves and tell their stories of being drawn to the piano as very young children and always having a passion for it, though many had to put their playing on hold while they completed their education and started their careers. Some had formal training and some are self-taught, but all are intent on performing their best. Maybe the movie tries to cover too many competitors, though they are all interesting people. It would have been nice to see more of the interaction between the various contestants.

Ten Days That Unexpectedly Changed America – 2006 (2.8). The History Channel produced this miniseries of ten documentaries by independent filmmakers. The days chosen were not rated or considered the most noteworthy; in fact they were actually days on which events happened that are not well remembered or the significance of which is not always fully appreciated. In chronological order, the days documented are: the colonists slaughtering the Pequot Indians in 1637, Shays Rebellion showing the inadequacy of the Articles of Confederation in 1787, the discovery of gold in California in 1848, the Civil War Battle of Antietam in 1862, Andrew Carnegie and the Pinkertons breaking the Homestead Steel strike in 1892, the McKinley Assasination and succession of Teddy Roosevelt to the Presidency in 1901, the Scopes trial over teaching evolution in public schools in 1925, Einstein’s letter urging FDR to authorize development of the atomic bomb in 1939, Elvis on the Ed Sullivan show as part of the changes in the younger generation in 1956, and the murder of the three civil rights workers in Mississippi in 1964. The movies use a variety of techniques including animation, reenactment, archival photographs and film footage and interviews of historians. Shays, using animation was the least interesting, while the Gold Rush, Antietam and Scopes trial offered the least new material to me. The two newest ones were of interest to me because I remember them happening. The Pequots massacre, Homestead Strike, McKinley Assassination and Einstein letter films offered lots of new information for me.

One Day on Earth – 2012 (2.7). Edited from over 3000 hours of footage claimed to be from every country in the world, this documentary provides glimpses of life filmed by locals and submitted to the compilers (onedayonearth.org), all taken on 10-10-10 (October 10, 2010). The pace of the movie is too frenetic at first but then slows down somewhat for later portions. There is some attempt to organize the presentation by topics such as marriage and music, contrasting diversity while also showing universality. While ambitious and encompassing, better organization and pacing would have made it more digestible, though the sheer volume of material must have been an enormous challenge. Nevertheless, seeing the variety of activity by our diverse fellow humans on the same day is an interesting experience.

Cinematographer Style – 2006 (2.7). This documentary of interviews with cinematographers should have been more interesting than it was. Part of the problem is the sheer number of people interviewed; over 110 were interviewed and portions of their comments edited into the movie. The interviews start with biographical background on everyone, then proceed into the development of their careers and working relationships with other film people and some of their techniques and philosophy of their art and craft. Notably missing are any clips from movies; this whole documentary is images of the cinematographers being interviewed. A better movie on this same subject, which did include illustrative film clips, is Visions of Light from 1992.

25^th Hour – 2002 (2.7). The first feature filmed in NYC after 9/11, this Spike Lee movie tells about the last 24 hours of freedom for a minor drug dealer due to start a seven year prison term in the morning. He uses the time to say his farewells to his girlfriend, two best buddies and his father, and to examine how he got into this trouble and who ratted on him. More character study than drama, with some subtle stylistic touches by Lee, the movie seems a little slow moving and longer than needed, and the story never seems to make any particular point, unless it is that we all make mistakes in life and when they catch up to us we have to decide whether to pay the price or run for cover.

Anna Karenina – 2012 (2.6). The choice to encase this movie version of the Tolstoy classic in the stylized setting of theater is quite disturbing at first, adding further distraction to figuring out who is who as the script jaunts along apparently assuming we are all familiar with the characters from having read the novel. By the time those of us who are classically challenged have figured out how everyone fits together and have become less put off by the stylistic nature of the production, the movie is half over, and those of us who stuck around to the end got somewhat of an idea of what the book is about, love in its various manifestations, including the doomed passionate love of Anna.

The Chess Players – 1977 (2.2). Satyajit Ray made many wonderful movies about India, but this is not one of the better ones. Set in 1856, it is an allegory about the British takeover of one of the last kingdoms in northern India. Two nobles play chess all day while ignoring their wives and the political developments. Meanwhile the British, who have previously coopted the King, decide it is now time to push him to abdicate. The British tactics and strategy are like the chess games – bloodless war. Sometimes bordering on slapstick, and then verging to cultural songs and poetry, the film seems a bit uneven; and the noble class involved in the movie are not as appealing characters as the more ordinary people of the best Ray movies.

Life of Pi – 2012 (2.0). I did not like this movie. I am not interested in spending time on supposed allegories about the existence of God, so I doubt I would ever read the book either. Computer generated special effects do not fascinate me or make a movie a must see for me, but I did watch the special feature on the DVD about how the effects were created. I did not see this movie in 3D and doubt that would make it a more appealing film for me. Fantasy movies can be fun adventures but I found this one to be tedious. The only part of the film that was passable was the time spent on the ground back in India, where I wish the whole movie had taken place – preferably with a better story.

The Magnificent Ambersons – 1942 (DNF).  In this second movie by Orson Welles, he used many of the techniques he embraced in Citizen Kane, such as low key lighting, long tracking shots and camera angles revealing the ceilings. Based on the Pulitzer winning novel about the new automobile industrialists displacing the old Midwest aristocracy, the script comes across more like a radio show than a film, with copious narration and dialogue. A subject that should have been interesting never got my attention and it wasn’t long before I was asleep. Welles was not allowed to finish the film the way he wanted, and neither was I; being awake would have been preferable. The picture is as old as me and this was my first try at watching it and will likely be my only one.