This month via Netflix streaming I finished watching an old
BBC series and viewed several movies with streaming rights about to expire. A
couple documentaries on healthy eating advocated drinking home juiced
vegetables and were effective enough to get us to incorporate green drinks into
our daily regimen.
Some of the movies that were up for various Oscars this
month have been added to my library hold list, but it may be a few months
before they show up and get listed here.
One of my two or so readers [Hi Shirley] wondered how she
could search for a review I might have written on a particular movie. The way
to do it is to use the search box at the top left of the blog web page (the
blank that has the magnifying glass). Put the title in quotes, then click on
the magnifying glass and it should take you to a web page list which includes
the movie review, and maybe also some pages where the movie is otherwise
mentioned by name. As with any search box, if the title is also a generic
phrase, you may get some hits where the phrase is used without it being a movie
title.
Here is what I have watched since I posted my last list.
[The ratings I give are on my own number system which is explained at the link
on the sidebar].
The Wildest Dream – 2010 (2.9). This nicely paced documentary from National Geographic Entertainment integrates the story of mountaineer George Mallory, who died near the top of Mount Everest in 1924, with the story of the man who found his body 75 years later and then decided to try to figure out whether Mallory could have actually been the first man to reach the summit and then died on his way down. A new expedition is mounted to recreate the equipment from 1924 and see if the final assault could have been accomplished with that gear. The integration of close up filming of the modern quest with vintage footage of the 1924 expedition is very effective.
Fat, Sick &
Nearly Dead – 2009 (2.9). This entertaining documentary first tells the
story of very successful Australian entrepreneur whose dietary and lifestyle
abuses resulted in him becoming extremely obese and caused or contributed to a
malfunctioning of his auto immune system. He uses his own freshly juiced
vegetable drinks while he conducts man in the street interviews with people
about their food and weight issues, first for a month in NYC and then for
another month traveling around the USA. The last half of the film shows how
some of the people he met gave the juice regimen a try and what results they
achieved. Limited use of talking heads, cutely relevant animation, a genuinely
engaging Aussie and some appealing protégés make for an uplifting movie.
Hungry for Change
– 2012 (2.8). There is plenty of good information from nutritional experts in
this documentary about our overly processed food supply and the medical
conditions we suffer from eating it. The most interesting interviews are with
people who had medical conditions, particularly morbid obesity, and then
achieved a healthy state by dietary and lifestyle changes. At times there
seemed to be too many talking heads saying pretty much the same thing.
Jeff, Who Lives at
Home – 2011 (2.8). This dramedy had a script that was different enough to
hold audience attention as we followed one day two adult brothers who don’t get
along and their widowed mother who wonders what is going to happen in the rest
of her life and the lives of her sons. Pat, the oldest son, has a
disintegrating marriage, while Jeff, the pot smoker, feels his destiny is
calling, but he doesn’t know for what. Sincere with a brash gentleness, it ends
with some effective emotion.
Poldark (Season
One) – 1975 (2.8). This old BBC series has an interesting time and place,
Cornwall after the American Revolution, but it is quite dated with low
production values, soap opera theme music, theatrical acting and melodramatic
scripts. That said, it does offer authentic scenery, quality performances and
interesting characters struggling with societal issues that were part of the
reason for the Revolution. There is a second season, dealing with the impact of
the French Revolution.
J. Edgar – 2011 (2.4).
The underlying reason for making this movie is not clear from watching it. The
overlong script jumps around in time and attention between the growth of the
FBI, Hoover’s personal life and his paranoid obsession that he had to be the
savior of America by corruptly becoming the most powerful man in the country.
Interweaving the stories of his intense relationship with his mother, his
apparently frustrated homosexuality and his empire building at the Bureau was
never effectively accomplished. The unrealistically dark low key lighting in
the interior scenes may have been intended to create some feeling of time past,
but was instead just annoying. If intended as a biopic, some scenes of Hoover’s
early family life and schooling would have been helpful, and showing how a man
trained in the law was driven to push law enforcement to use scientific methods
would have been enlightening. To make a good drama about the abuses of power by
Hoover, we should have been shown one or more adversaries and critics trying to
rein him in or end his regime, rather than merely being given the one scene of
a Senate hearing where he is embarrassed for his publicity seeking. Di Caprio
did a good job playing a man with a rather flat personality. Tolson’s makeup in
old age looked like a cheap mask.
Me and Orson Welles
– 2008 (2.4). Full of Broadway theater name dropping from the late 1930s, this
drama sports high production values and decent acting but suffers from a slow
starting script that doesn’t have much to deliver when it finally starts to get
going a little, right before the end. A way too old looking high school student
(and no, making his classmates look as old as him does not solve the problem)
easily gets a role in a new play adaptation of Julius Caesar that Orson is
debuting on Broadway. Depression, what Depression? We know nothing about this
kid other than his wide eyed ambition and at the end he has only learned what
everyone was saying from the start – Orson is a pompous ass who sleeps with all
the attractive women.
Nothing But the Truth
– 2008 (2.4). Inspired by the Valerie Plame outing as a covert CIA agent, this
drama tells of newspaperwoman who writes an agent outing story given her by a
source and corroborated by two other sources, none of whom she will reveal to a
special prosecutor, who refuses to take no for an answer. Though some serious
questions are touched on in this movie, the script is muddled as to what the
news story actually said and why it was newsworthy beyond just outing an agent.
There were implications regarding a report the agent wrote and op-ed pieces her
husband published criticizing the Presidential administration, but they were
never developed in any way that made sense.
The Homecoming
-1973 (2.2). I streamed this TV version of the Pinter play because the Netflix
rights were about to expire, and honestly I snoozed through a lot of it. Some
of it was absurdly funny. I know there is supposed to be meaningful symbolism
and deep meaning behind this. But it is just not my cup of tea.
Tom, I can agree with your comments about "J Edgar", still I enjoyed the movie. But your comments about "Jeff, Who Lives at Home" did not mention the humor. Did you not get any laughs out of it?
ReplyDeleteThe movie did make me laugh in places, with humor arising naturally from the story, rather than by contrivance. The brothers were each skewed in different ways and at first seemed incompatible. Their eccentricities and the resulting frictions were funny. Their mother's meeting at the water cooler revealed that DNA played a part in the quirkiness. I called the film a dramedy, which to me is a serious story with humorous aspects, as opposed to a comedy, which is a story designed primarily for laughs. After navigating the humorous stumbles of life, the family learned that for all their differences, they are still a family.
ReplyDeleteJan and I watched The Ides of March. I enjoyed it and Jan was thoroughly bored by it. I am fascinated by "real politicians", those who get the standup guy elected. Karl Rove comes immediately to mind, also Harry Hopkins. Of course, some standup guys are good politicians: Bill Clinton, Richard Nixon, and FDR, (notice the overlaps), maybe Obama? Although I enjoyed the movie quite a bit, I have this feeling that the movie was too contrived, a stawman example of how real politicians behave.
ReplyDeleteI had not heard of Ides, which apparently was inspired by Howard Dean's unsuccessful 2004 campaign. Predictions on it are marginal for me, but I like politics and can easily get this from the library, so may give it a try. It is still amazing to me that Dean's campaign was permanently derailed by his enthusiastic shout out to his young campaign workers. I think the media across the political spectrum just did not believe Dean was a profesional enough politician to be President.
ReplyDeleteJan and I watched 50/50 from Netflix. What a good movie! We both enjoyed the drama and the comic scenes. The inexperienced therapist and the unfaithful girlfriend are very well presented. By contrast, the goodhaearted but boorish best male friend seems a charactiture, but still his role was well done. I recommend this movie.
ReplyDeleteI did watch Ides from the library. It was better than expected, though the ending may have been a little pat. I'll write more about it on my next list. I see that 50/50 is readily available from the library also, and it is predicted to be pretty good, so I'll get it too.
ReplyDeleteSusan and I just watched 50/50 and we found it both fun and sad. I'll write more about it on my next list. In another inadvertent double bill, we also watched Beginners, a semi-biographical movie about a patient and his family and friends dealing with his terminal cancer diagnosis. That movie suffered from a poor script, though it was trying to make the same point as 50/50, about a cancer diagnosis providing an opportunity for a new beginning for the patient and those in the life of the patient. It will be on the next list also.
ReplyDeleteJan and I watched Midnight in Paris from Neflix. Jan had already seen it with friends in a theater, but she knew I would like it so she ordered it for me, and, sure enough, I liked it. I loved the scenes of Paris, most of which I could identify by name, and others that I could not name but were very familiar to me. From 1971 to 1995 I traveled to Paris on business about once every two years on average. It is my favorite city, far ahead of other cities I love: Seattle, Boston and Phoenix.
ReplyDeleteThe story is about the so called Lost Generation of American intellectual elites who lived in Paris for a short or long time in the 1920's. It focuses on a fictional Gil Pender who arrives from the late 2000's or early 2100's to join these expatriots.
Woody Allen has made another great movie. I think he is my age - where does he get the creativity and drive to do another great movie? I admire him as I'm about to retire from a job I like quite a bit, but I feel it is time. Woody obviously doesn't.
I gave Midnight 2.9; here is what I posted:
ReplyDelete"Owen Wilson takes over the Woody Allen role while Woody just directs this romantic comedy about an American writer engaged to the wrong woman, in which the couple visits Paris with her parents and the man ends up wandering around on his own and being taken back in time to Paris of the 20s, where he interfaces with the creative celebrities and meets a woman with whom he is a better match. Despite winning the screenplay Academy Award, the script is nothing new, except for one twist that comes before the predictable ending. The Beauty of Paris is well captured by the cinematography, the celebrity characters are fun and entertaining and the overall experience of the movie is quite pleasing."
Woody is about five or six years older than you and I. He tries to direct about one movie a year. His filmography is quite diverse and I have pretty much tapped it out.
I have only had the pleasure of visiting Paris once, for a week in the summer of 1969, near the end of our two month Eurail version of the grand European tour. My last Paris note in our travel diary was, "Though eager to get home, we are melancholy at the thought of ending our tour - especially when we are so comfortably settled here."