The Wonder Years series from the late 1980s uses the above
titled song for its theme. I have been working my way through the episodes and
now am in the third of five years. Stripped of commercials and other time
waters, these TV episodes are 23 minutes, and if you speed through the opening
and closing credits, there is about 20 minutes of show. Netflix instant view is
a great way to watch an old series that you missed or that you want to revisit.
Interspersed with TWY I have picked movies by whim from the
higher rated ones in my queue, which you can see from my ratings below are not
really very high. Documentaries dominate since that genre is a personal
favorite. You may also notice the prevalence of movies about different
cultures.
Taking the title question literally and understanding that
the question comes from a friend, my answer would be that I would sing along –
probably also out of tune, which is pretty easy for me to do.
Here is what I have watched since I posted my last list. [The
ratings I give are on my own number system which is explained at the link on
the sidebar].
The Wonder Years
(Season One) – 1988 (3.5). Through the years I have seen various episodes of
this series and always enjoyed the way it captured the feeling of 1968 in
general and the feeling of 1968 suburbia in particular. The awkwardness of
becoming a teenager in 1968 was not much different from what I experienced in
the mid 1950s and what my children experienced in the 1980s, so there is
another nostalgic reason to watch, both from the child and the parental point
of view. The pilot season, as the kids become sixth graders and enter middle
school, only had six episodes and I remember them all, as we got to meet the
friends, school mates, faculty, parents and siblings. This kind of series can
be timeless; made in the 80s reliving the 60s, and in the new century reliving how
the 80s portrayed the 60s.
The Last Mountain
– 2011 (3.2). This intelligent documentary presents the issue of the dangers of
mountaintop coal mining by focusing in on a move by Massey Energy to blow the
top off the last mountain in a particular part of West Virginia. Aerial footage
shows the scale of destruction and activist victims of pollution of air and
water and the flooding and other damage caused by such operations are followed
as they struggle against the corporate behemoth and its governmental enablers.
Bobby Kennedy, Jr. who is an environmental lawyer is shown offering his support
and is a voice of knowledgeable understanding throughout the movie. Clean
energy alternatives are offered near the end of the film and Kennedy gets the
ear of President Obama who sets the ball rolling to start to hold Massey
responsible for its wholesale violations of environmental protection and safety
laws.
The Wonder Years
(Season Two) – 1988 (3.2). The second season follows the story arc as the kids
enter seventh grade and concentrates more heavily on Kevin who has always been
the narrator looking back 20 years. The same techniques are continued from the
pilot season. In addition to the well done narration, there are vintage songs,
simulated home movies, TV news clips and some surreal dream or imagination
scenes (a la Ally McBeal). Though each episode covers a new aspect of the
growing up experience, the novelty appeal is slightly diminished.
Last Train Home –
2009 (3.0). The largest simultaneous migration in human history is the travel
by young Chinese city workers back to their rural homes for Chinese New Year.
This Chinese documentary shows one young couple who for many years have left
their two children with the grandparents so that the parents can earn money to
support the family and hopefully make life better for the younger generation.
As the granddaughter reaches teen age, her resentment against her parents
erupts and causes turmoil almost as great as the human turmoil in the
overwhelmed train stations. Maybe her generation will address the issue her
parents’ generation seems to be ignoring: what should be done about a
government that reneged on a promise of lifetime security for everyone.
Off and Running –
2009 (3.0). An African-American high school girl in NYC, who has been raised
since infancy by a white Jewish lesbian couple, decides to contact her birth
mother who gave her up for adoption in this efficient and intelligent
documentary,which was co-written by the girl. Unfortunately, while her adoptive
mothers support the attempt at contact, the birth mother reacts with
ambivalence and the girl becomes confused and her relationship with her
adoptive family strained. Her adoptive family includes her Princeton bound
older brother, a multi-racial African-American, who is a confidante to her but
who is more interested in choosing how to go forward with his life, and a
younger Korean brother to whom she is almost like a loving aunt. The girl lets
the process affect how she lives her life as she becomes more and more
confused. When she gets with an Asian counselor with a similar background,
better understanding is bound to result, but we are only able to see just the
beginning of that relationship before the movie ends. The girl says she will
hold off on pursuing her birth mother until she finishes college; so maybe a
sequel can cover that.
21 Up in South Africa
– 2006 (2.9). Modeled after the British series, this documentary started with a
disparate group of seven year olds at age 7, at the end of the apartheid era,
then checked back on them at 14, and now at 21. Not as captivating as the
British series, here we have a much more unsettled and desperate group of young
people, giving evidence to the actual lack of economic opportunities even
though the racial restrictions of apartheid have ended. The devastation of Aids
and is evidenced by the fact that two of the three children who did not live to
21 died of the disease.
Don Juan DeMarco –
2004 (2.9). Johnny Depp thinks he is the legendary Don Juan. Marlon Brando is a
burned out shrink who becomes captivated by his imaginative new patient.
Pleasantly different and watchable to the end, even if there is nothing
profound or touching.
Africa – Savannah
Homecoming – 2001 (2.9). Part of a seven part National Geographic series,
this episode tells about two women in East Africa who are facing a mid-life
decision about whether to change their way of living. One woman is a city bred
college graduate who married a man from a primitive hunting village where they
live with their children. She travels back to the city to see her family for
the first time in ten years and to consider whether to move back to the city.
The other woman has a strong tribal identity, though she now works as a
hairdresser in the big city. She is pregnant by a man from her tribe who is
apparently not going to stay involved with the woman and child, but it is very
important for her to travel back to the country home of her tribal roots so
that her child can be born there according to tradition. This is a
straightforward and respectful presentation of these culturally diverse
stories.
Custer’s Last Stand
– 2011 (2.8). From PBS American Experience, this documentary, using interviews
of historians, archival photographs and filmed re-enactments, told the story of
Custer from an unfamiliar viewpoint, offering some biography and personality
exploration along with explanation of how the man came to be mythologized. Of
particular novelty was the information on his marriage to the woman who as his
widow strived to perpetuate the myth of Custer as a symbol of rugged American
individualism bringing about manifest destiny.
Ocean of Pearls –
2008 (2.8). This movie about a top notch young Canadian surgeon who is offered
a dream job in Detroit, but then realizes his Sikh turban is holding him back
is watchable enough, but leaves a sense of never getting deep enough into the
characters and issues. Cutting his hair and discarding the turban would be a
travesty to the religious principles his immigrant father continuously preaches
and it would also undermine his relationship with his Sikh girlfriend. But
aren’t these religious trappings outdated and no longer necessary, particularly
where they interfere with the pioneer life-saving organ transplant work he
wants to do?
Africa – Mountains of
Faith – 2001 (2.8). Part of a seven part National Geographic series, this
episode tells about two teenage country boys in Ethiopia, one who goes to the
big city to shine shoes 72 hours a week to support his family back home and one
who trains to follow in the religious footsteps of his father. The mountainous
geography of Ethiopia and the unique blend of its ancient religious beliefs
with Christianity are the features here.
To Sir, with Love
– 1966 (2.7). Sidney Poitier plays a man who worked his way to an engineering
degree but then could only find a job as a high school teacher in an East
London school populated by a band of undisciplined kids. Of course after an
initial shock he wins the kids over and changes his life in the process. Maybe
it was a new theme back then, particularly with a black teacher in a
predominantly white school, but this was not well done. The cast had much new
talent, none of whom ever became famous, but the script was unconvincing and
the direction mediocre. Poitier was shown in a lot of facial close-ups just
sort of pondering or brooding. The music and dancing was sort of hot back then
but is pretty laughable now, especially Sidney doing what looks like a funky
chicken.
Jan and I watched No Direction Home: Bob Dylan: Side 1. Or, I should say, I watched while she read a book. She never cared for Dylan the singer, but she does like some of his songs. We recently took our granddaughter to see the musical comedy Marvelous Wondrettes. That was a great show. We enjoyed it and so did 13 year old Eva. That show featured songs from the same era as Bob Dylan including Stupid Cupid, Mr Sandman, Lollipop, Shoop, Shoop. Those were the songs Jan remembers from her youth, but I remember Bob Dylan, Joan Baez, Peter, Paul and Mary etc. I enjoyed the Bob Dylan movie, and it brought feelings of nostalgia for those times that the Marvelous Wondrettes did not. Dylan sang about the civil rights movement and anti-war songs - the lyrics were meaningful, not shoop - shoop. But what music will last? Eva loved the Marvelous Wondrettes including shoop - shoop, but I wouldn't even consider taking her to see No Direction Home. The long history of folk songs will continue, but most recently in the early sixties it briefly became mainstream. That might happen again, but will it happen in Eva's lifetime?
ReplyDeleteI seem to bridge the musical gap between you and Jan. I identified with the meaning of the Dylan songs of struggle and protest [I gave No Direction Home 3 stars after seeing it last summer], but I also remember the earlier songs from the radio and from watching American Bandstand on TV. I liked the Dylan and other folk songs, doo wop, R&B and the Motown sound. The cutesy numbers like those from the Wonderettes [I haven’t seen the musical]seemed a bit lame to me as a teenager. But I do have a soft spot for “Mr. Sandman” and I’ll tell you why. On my 13th birthday I had a small party at home and invited some 8th grade classmates, my two best buddies and five girls I particularly liked. The girls gave me a 45RPM record of --- you guessed it. Every time I hear the song, I remember the party and the kids. The boys have both died. I am not sure about the girls. Next year was O’Dea High, all boys, so no birthday parties.
ReplyDeleteAs for folk music becoming mainstream in the next couple generations, while I too doubt it, the right combination of issues and musicians could possibly trigger it again sometime, like happened in the sixties.
My sister-in-law, Shirley in Las Vegas, just sent me an e-mail about Film Movement movies. I know she reads this blog and I have been encouraging her to add her comments. I’m letting her know I am replying to her mail with this post, so that we can remind others not to overlook Film Movement, and to once again encourage her to post some comments here. When Siskel and Ebert were on TV, Shirley would always send me their annual lists of ten best movies. I have the lists from 1992 through 1999 and I continue to check them off as I see them (better late than never). In fact, I see there are some more I have watched since I last checked off on the lists.
ReplyDeleteFilm Movement as you may know is a monthly DVD club which chooses independent and foreign films to distribute to its members. The DVDs also include an extra short film, often animated. I am not a member, but I have used their film list as a source of movies to consider and I have watched many of them through Netflix and the library. In fact, Netflix has many of them available on instant play (but without the shorts) and they have the trailers for a preview. So if we can’t support Film Movement directly by joining, we can help their sales and streaming income by getting them from Netflix by mail or instant play.
If you haven’t been to their web site, here is the link to Film Movement
I just checked the first 17 on their list and see that I have seen 3 of them, which I rated 3.5, 3.2 and 3.0. I checked Netflix for the prediction on the others. Two Netflix did not have. Here are the predictions for the others: 1 at 2.9, 4 at 2.8, 1 at 2.7, 3 at 2.6, 1 at 2.5, 1 at 2.4 and 1 at 2.3. So it does seem that I already watched the three best for me. The other 5 predicted at 2.8 or better are all available from Netflix for instant play, so I have added them to my queue. It looks like I am overdue for another round of Film Movement gleaning. Even when a Film Movement movie is not very good, it is still interesting to see what the independent movie maker was trying to do and in the case of a foreign film, to see how things look in another part of the world.
Jan and I watched "Iron Lady" in a mostly empty theater. The movie has been out for a while so that may explain the lack of interest. Jan and I both liked it very much, probably for slightly different reasons. I liked the outstanding performance of Meryl Streep, and I know Jan did too. I consider her a genius, on the level of Steve Jobs or of one of Job's favorites, Bob Dylan (see above).
ReplyDeleteI liked it also because it covered, in cameo style, the major events during her 11 year long tenure as Prime Minister. I was dumbfounded by what I didn't know or didn't remember about her time as Prime Minister. I have spent most of this evening on the internet reviewing the history of Britain in her time.
Jan, not interested in politics, was taken by the relationships shown in the movie, especially those in the present where she is suffering from dementia, but also those relationships when she was losing power.
This movie is praised by all for the performance of Streep, but is criticized for at least two reasons: the movie has no message and it is insensitive to a living person.
Ebert is quoted as saying that Meryl Streep is all dressed up but has nowhere to go. Very clever: he says Meryl Streep did a fine acting job, but the movie has nothing to say. I disagree. I think it portrayed well a heroic story told over and over again from the beginning of literature how a person born poor and with no inherited advantages can rise to the highest power and influence the lives of everyone for good or bad. In this case the hero is a woman, the first female PM of Britain.
The second criticism is that it portrays well the suffering of a demented person, but such a movie should not be made while the subject is still alive. My mind goes every which way with this criticsm. Movies have been made of live people and the subjects of those movies may object to what is portrayed even if the portrayal does not contain dementia. I also think that most people recognize that Streep's portrayal of dementia is generic, not an exact depiction of the suffering of Thatcher. Finally, I think Streep's portrayal is sympathetic.
I say: go see this movie.
Netflix predicts 2.8 for me on The Iron Lady. I’ve written here before about how sometimes Meryl Streep’s acting is so good that we pay more attention to the acting job itself rather than the role, which to me is not a good thing. I remember seeing a documentary about Margaret Thatcher, but do not remember the details. She deserves credit for the power she achieved, which is especially hard for a woman to do. But I do not care for her brand of politics, which is too much like that of her American crony, Reagan. I’ll put the movie down for viewing sometime down the road and then can give an opinion on what it had to say. A former public figure by choice is fair game for a movie. When they have dementia, they cannot defend against unfair portrayal, but then they also may not be capable of being hurt by it. If the portrayal is accurate and even as you say sympathetic, and fits with the story being told, then in my opinion is it is appropriate.
ReplyDeleteJan and I watched "Battle in Seattle" tonight from Netflix. We both enjoyed the movie. It told a story of ordinary people being persecuted and manipulated by powerful forces. It also showed scenes of the city in which I grew up. There was not much nostalgia as many of the scenes were not familiar to me having moved away 40 years ago, but the placenames did bring back memories: Westlake Plaza was a busy street back then before they blocked part of it off to make a plaza.
ReplyDeleteJan was so-so about the movie. It entertained her but the politics was lost on her. She was the butt of the joke when one of the jailed protestors, trying to bolster the morale of the protest leader said something like "take heart. Yesterday nobody knew what the WTO is and today (pause) they still don't know what the WTO is". I enjoyed the movie quite a lot, but wonder how accurately it depicted the actual event. I remember reading about the protests in 1999, and I did not feel the drama that was depicted in the movie. But Phoenix is a long way from Seattle geograhically and politically so maybe I just didn't get it. Tom, Renton is close geograhically but it may be a bit of a hayseed community (my 40 year memory of it) to be close politically. What is your opinion of the accuracy of the movie's depiction of the WTO convention in Seattle?
Here is what I wrote about the movie on this blog last summer, when I gave it 2.9:
ReplyDelete“The protests against the WTO meeting in Seattle in 1999 brought unprecedented attention to this international quasi-governmental puppet of multinational corporations. This movie about those protests does a good job of capturing the developing events, concentrating on the veteran peaceful protest organizers, one swat team member and his wife, and a TV reporter caught up in the violence that erupted after anarchists targeted the windows of chain stores and Seattle police efforts to disperse or arrest deteriorated into a police riot. WTO snubs of a representative of Doctors Without Borders seeking low cost medicines and of a delegate from an African nation trying to get more equity for smaller nations were appealing subplots that could have used for screen time, but overall the film conveyed an effective message of the resilience of protestors in the face of unsympathetic corporate greed.”
It is still amazing to me how easy it was for the multi-national corporate behemoths to pull off the WTO coup. At the time, I had no idea of what the WTO was and I did not pay close attention to what was about to take place in the meetings in Seattle. But as the parades and demonstrations started, my interest was aroused. When I saw that the usual progressive liberal young demonstrators were being joined by labor union members I began to realize this was something more significant than I expected. Local TV coverage was extensive and I was almost totally retired, so I watched it all.
Then it started to get ugly, with anarchists crashing in store windows and starting fires and the police being overwhelmed and insufficiently prepared. Susan was working in downtown Seattle at the time for a State agency. As the danger grew, they closed the office so people could head for safety. Transportation was disrupted but Susan managed to get to a place where she could catch a bus on the edge of downtown and I picked her up from there by car.
I watched the coverage for the rest of the evening as the police used force and gas to move everyone out of the downtown core. They pursued a main group up to Capitol Hill where it looked like something we would be seeing now from Syria, with uniformed police behind shields seeming dedicated to destroying any vestige of resistance to their force.
Today the WTO exerts its power over international trade and economic matters in an almost secretive way, without any democratic selection of its operatives and with little or no public scrutiny. Environmental and labor standards and other issues of social importance are totally disregarded in furtherance of corporate income enhancement.
As for hayseed Renton, we do not have our own TV or radio station so our immediate news is Seattle news; our politics are Democrat in general but our Congressional seat includes some of Republican Bellevue. During the Battle in Seattle, our then Sheriff was shown personally chasing anarchists, an image which helped him win election to our Congressional seat as a Republican when he retired from the Sheriff position. We have not yet been able to come up with a good enough Democrat to unseat him.
Tom,
ReplyDeleteJust be glad your sheriff is not named "Joe Arpaio".
Jan and I watched Barney's Version. Paul Giamatti is a very good actor, but I'm beginning to wonder if he has only one character and the movies he plays in are structured around his role. Nevertheless, Jan and I both enjoyed the movie, but found his character's appeal to the three women in his life to be mystifying. Because of that I cannot call this a good movie despite being caught up in it.
ReplyDeleteJan and I wastched a movie on TV tonight: Some Like it Hot starring Marilyn Monroe, Tony Curtis, and Jack Lemmon. It was terrible. I could go on and explain why it was terrible, but I don't have the energy. This is the first Marilyn Monroe movie I have watched. I guess I thought I was too sophisticated to enjoy Marilyn Monroe movies in my youth when they were new. I know that sounds pompous, but if this is a typical Monroe movie, maybe I was right.
ReplyDeleteMarilyn was usually cast as a sweet but not very bright sex goddess. The thrill of Some Like It Hot was supposed to be the male actors in drag role and the form fitting and revealing dress of Marilyn. She had capabilities as a dramatic actress, as can be seen in Niagara, Bus Stop and The Misfits.
ReplyDeleteHere is what I wrote about Barney's version, which I gave 2.7 stars:
"The novel may have been acclaimed but this Canadian movie adaptation is disappointing, with an uneven and uninteresting script. A bit overlong, the film nevertheless fails to take the time to help us understand any of the characters. There are a few laughs up front, as the movie borders on buffoonery, but then as the hero marries the woman of his dreams (his third marriage) the humor disappears, but the drama never develops because the story jumps along without allowing for any character development beyond aging. Paul Giamatti does good with the little he is given, Minnie Driver’s talents are wasted and Rosamund Pike’s supposedly dream girl part is actually blandly written. I guess the story is supposed to be all from the hero’s subjective point of view, but that is not made very clear, and even so, it does not make the movie any better."
Giamatti is a character actor who, though very good, seems to have a limited range, subdued and fairly depressed. His performance as John Adams was a pleasant surprise. Two other movies I liked him in that come to mind are Sideways and American Splendor.
Tom,
ReplyDeleteI'd forgotten about his John Adams role. He was good at that and that role was very different from the Sideways role. And, as you mentioned it, I do think I saw The Misfits. I'll have to watch that one again.