Newer movies have still been showing on my home theater, but I am about ready to start spreading choices out over a larger date range again. This latest batch of new films has not been that exciting. I did finally manage to get a four DVD set of the 1985 documentary Shoah, which included over nine hours of viewing. Fair Game, a true political drama tops the list. Bringing up the rear is the disappointing Babel from 2006.
So again, here is what I have watched on DVD and streaming since I posted my last list. The ratings I give are on my own number system explained at the link on the sidebar. Those watched via Netflix instant view, include “Streamed” after the numeric rating.
Fair Game – 2010 (3.4). This drama effectively tells the story of the outed CIA agent Valerie Plame Wilson and her husband Joe. For those who did not follow this news story over the four year course, the movie provides a good presentation starting by showing the type of undercover work Plame did for 18 years, working to prevent nuclear proliferation, and how her husband, who had extensive ambassadorial experience in Niger, was asked by the CIA to investigate whether there was any substance to reports that Saddam Hussein had obtained uranium ore from that African country, and he did travel to Niger and investigated, reporting back to the CIA the story was not true. The film then touches on the fraudulent methods the Bush administration employed to push for an invasion of Iraq and how Wilson finally wrote his op ed piece exposing the lie about Niger. What followed was a carefully orchestrated campaign to take the focus off the lies that misled us into the war and place it instead on Plame and her husband, exposing her as an operative without regard to how that would jeapordize the non-proliferation mission, maligning her professional status and work and accusing them both of dishonesty, conflicted self-interest and lack of patriotism. For those who did follow the news, this film adds additional information about the nature of Plame’s undercover work and the terrible pressure this ordeal put on their marriage. The film was well written, acted and directed and I decided to watch it a second time, listening to commentary from Plame and Wilson, who were quite pleased with the accuracy of the movie and the importance of the message it gives, that Americans need to stand up for truth and speak out when the government is lying.
Shoah – 1985 (3.2). Eleven years in the filming with five years of editing, this almost ten hour documentary by Claude Lanzmann, a WWII French resistance member, is a holocaust movie that does not use archival footage. What Lanzmann did was track down surviving prisoners, some of whom worked at the gas chambers and crematoriums of some German Nazi concentration camps in Poland, some guards and other Nazis (a few clandestinely filmed) and some townspeople who lived near the camps during the War. His interviewing style, usually with interpreters, was exhaustive and almost excruciating in eliciting details. He had a way of drawing people out in a low key manner, validating the importance of what they had to say by the time and patience he put in to extract minute details from them. He also sought subjective comments from the interviewees on their own thoughts and feelings and on those of the other players in this horrible drama of extermination. Sometimes the interviewees are on screen and at other times the camera visits the remnants of the sites while the interview continues in voice over. Most interviews are sparsely subtitled, but some are spoken in English. This is a unique historical record, confirming the mechanical organization of Nazi brutality, the pervasiveness of anti-Semitism and the almost totally hopeless situation in which these Jews found themselves. Netflix does not have this DVD set. The King County Library, now number one in circulation in the US, has one copy, which is the set I watched. They should buy more; Amazon has vendors who offer new sets for $70. If you ever get the chance to see this film, it is worth the time.
IMAX: Hubble – 2010 (3.0). This short documentary should really be seen in 3D at an IMAX theater, but I settled for the DVD version on my home theater [I’m not screening Blu-Ray yet, even though I have the player, because my TV is only 42” 720p; whenever I upgrade the TV, I may spring for the extra Netflix charge for BluRay]. The movie concentrates on the most recent mission to repair the Hubble, but most fascinating is the imagery traveling through the vastness of the universe, and back in time, via this amazing technology. [Editorial comment, not part of the movie comment: I wonder if we’ll ever learn why, from the billions of options, God chose this little blue speck for the Garden of Eden. Maybe someday we will have a powerful enough telescope to go back in time and see how the choice was made].
Cranford: Return to Cranford – 2009 (3.0). This two episode sequel to the British miniseries was a bit disappointing. It apparently started where the series left off, but gave no recap or assistance in helping the viewer recall the characters and the plot, so it took almost all the first episode to start to get things back in memory. Then we had to wind up a few plot items from before and add some new ones which also had to be wrapped up promptly. All the usual British period piece qualities were present, except the script was not top notch.
Casino Jack and the United States of Money – 2010 (2.9) Streamed. After watching the dramatized version of the story of disgraced lobbyist Jack Abramoff, I streamed this documentary from Netflix. If you are going to watch both movies, I recommend watching the documentary first, to try to get the factual chronology straight, though it is still sort of complex to follow. The drama gives a personal side not contained in the documentary, though they both show how greedy scum lobbyists and corrupt politicians and staffers are hijacking our electoral and governmental process.
Unstoppable – 2010 (2.9). Being a railfan definitely adds to the entertainment value of this powerful action movie about a runaway freight train. Character development and subplots are minimal, but there is some good chemistry between the always watchable Denzel Washington and his inexperienced accomplice.
Welcome to the Rileys – 2010 (2.9). The auto crash death of their 15 year old daughter has left an Indianapolis couple childless and depressed. When he goes to a convention in New Orleans, he meets a young lap dancer who reminds him of his daughter and decides to hang around to try to influence her out of the tawdry life in which she has become ensnared. His wife, who has not left the house since the death of their daughter, decides to go to New Orleans to find him. Simply written, well-acted by James Gandolfini (except for his odd accent), Melissa Leo and Kristen Stewart, and thankfully non-indulgent in sex scenes, this movie presents the difficulty of opening up when life seems to have closed on us.
Flipped – 2010 (2.8). This Rob Reiner movie borrows from the Wonder Years for junior high romantic angst and Rashomon for dual point of view. It has a few moments that are touching, but the central premise of a 2nd grade girl being attracted solely by the looks of a new neighbor boy who joins her class, and then she can’t shake the attraction even as her intelligence and sensitivity continue to blossom into junior high years, while he continues to be dull and timid left me annoyed. Why didn’t she give up on him and find a better match?
Tangled – 2010 (2.8). Disney and Pixar present the story of Rapunzel 21st Century style. Pleasant enough with a few elements to hold adult attention, though I wonder how youngsters would do with its length. I don’t watch movies with my young grandkids, so I don’t keep up with what is available in this genre. This film did not have the usual celebrity voice overs, which was fine with me.
The Illusionist – 2010 (2.7). This is the French animated film from the maker of The Triplets of Belleville. The technique is quite accomplished and unique, but as with Triplets, I did not find the story appealing. This tale was based on an unfilmed Jacques Tati script, and the animated sad hero was a takeoff on the Tati character, playing a magician who is being passed over by the emerging new entertainments of the 1960s. The young girl who still believes in him is perhaps intended to be allegorical, but I never felt a connection with her or their relationship.
Casino Jack – 2010 (2.7). Kevin Spacey says he keeps his personal life hidden because it makes it easier for audiences to accept him as the character he plays. That doesn’t work for me. I don’t know or care about his personal life and yet he is one of those actors who always seems to me like he is an actor rather than the character, and he usually plays unlikeable characters to boot, like disgraced lobbyist Jack Abramoff here. A very muddled script makes the story hard to follow, except to know that Jack and his cronies are total jerks and Graham Greene is an honorable Indian. A better bet, also from 2010, may be the documentary Casino Jack and the United States of Money, available now on Netflix instant view, to get the facts, and then maybe watch this drama to add a personal element.
Babel – 2006 (2.0). Knowing this would be marginal at best, I finally gave it a try. That was a mistake. This is a nothing script which tries to seem profound by teasing us with how three story lines will intersect. The first two merge pretty quickly, while the last one waits almost to the end of the movie, by which time we could care less. Cate Blanchett is totally wasted, while the film rolls incessantly on a young actress whose role is just to be deaf and horny and flash her pantyless private area. The narrative interweaving is about as shallow as could be and we learn nothing of interest about any of the characters as people.